Remote Viewing (RV) is a process by which ordinary humans are able to mentally view things at remote locations without any prior knowledge or information about the objects at that location. There are numerous people (NOT including myself) who can attest to the validity and value of RV, including Joe McMoneagle, a U. S. military Intelligence officer who described his experiences with RV in several books:
- MIND TREK, Exploring Consciousness Time and Space through Remote Viewing, 1993 (revised 1997),
- THE ULTIMATE TIME MACHINE, A Remote Viewer’s Perception of Time, and Predictions for the New Millennium, (1998),
- REMOTE VIEWING SECRETS, A Handbook, (2000), and
- THE STAR GATE CHRONICLES, Memoirs of a Psychic Spy, (Summer – 2002).
The first time I heard of remote viewing was when I read a book that my wife happened to find at a used book store called Psychic Warrior: The True Story of America’s Foremost Psychic Spy and the Cover-Up of the CIA’s Top-Secret Stargate Program (1998) by David Morehouse. Morehouse later published Remote Viewing: The Complete User’s Manual for Coordinate Remote Viewing (2011), and now with a PhD in education, he offers courses on remote viewing and quantum learning.
Both of these men spent the better part of their military careers conducting actual remote viewing operations for numerous U. S. Intelligence Agencies. Their works are referenced here as verifiable data that supports the holomorphic process (separation, projection, reflection and reintegration) as a theoretical model.
By visualizing one’s mind-body system as a holomorphic unit comprised of holocells, which are self-sustaining, self-controlled, closed-loop feedback systems that form harmonic patterns of information-modulated energy, from all the way down to the quantum level, and realizing that the part that is doing the visualizing is also part of a highly complex holocell, it is easy to see how it can separate and project itself outward in “time-space” and “space-time” and literally be at any remote location and time. That, I submit, is how remote viewing works. However, the viewer has to be mature enough to have opened the mind’s eyes and courageous enough to face the truth of what he or she sees.
Remote Viewing is a process.
RV, as well as out-of-body experiences and other psychic phenomena, can be understood by modelling reality, and everything in it, as a holomorphic function. The term “holomorphic function” comes from complex mathematics. It basically refers to any function that is differentiable and is used here to describe a holistic phenomenon that starts with separating a holistic phenomenon, and differentiating the two aspects of the whole in a non-linear way. For example, a particle is modelled as a function of both its static and a dynamic aspect, like the spatial (particle) and temporal (wave) aspects of a quantum particle or the human body and the mind. Even as a spatial function that changes in time, i.e. as a particle that moves in space, the whole is a spatiotemporal, holomorphic process because it is a reflection of truth and that truth serves as feedback that reintegrates it into a whole. A more technical discussion of a holomorphic function is presented later. The focus of this article is how it can be applied to understanding RV.
One first needs to realize that there is no real separation between a physical object and its surrounding space. What we perceive as a boundary is just that, perceived. This is well-known and understood in physics because we know that all physical matter is nothing but points of pure energy-in-motion. It is in-formed out of undifferentiated energy (the infinite field of truth itself) that is differentiated and reintegrated into what we call particles. The dynamic aspect, motion, is what creates potential boundaries (potential means no actual boundary but more like the idea of a boundary), which become virtual boundaries (like actual force fields) in the presence and relative motion of other particles (also points of energy-in-motion). In essence, every particle is a spatiotemporal process and every combination of particles is also a spatiotemporal holomorphic process, only more complex.
The second thing to realize is that in a spatiotemporal process, time is not something different than space. They are simply different aspects of the same process. Thinking of time as a separate dimension independent of space (like we were told to do by Isaac Newton) served the purpose of allowing us to perform analyses, but quantum physics taught us that we reached the limit of that analysis and we now have to reintegrate the two. Early physicists and mathematicians defined and quantified dimensions in space by equating them to the number of independent degrees of freedom of movement. A point represents zero degrees of freedom and is said to be zero dimensional. A line represents one degree of freedom and is therefore called one dimensional, etc. Space is represented by three dimensions. When we want to analyze the motion of an object moving in space and time, we pretend that the space is separated and projected out into a 3-D coordinate system. (Note that “pretend” means to bend the truth.) Our analysis has nothing to do with the object or with spacetime, and everything to do with our mental process of analysis.
If a 3-D coordinate system is drawn with an object at the center, it can move “outward” in any direction in time, but we represent it in terms of three spatial dimensions. We almost never do this in physics class, but we could also draw a time axis as a projection outward from the center. I said “almost never do this” because it is exactly what is done with a Minkowski-space diagram, where 3-D space is drawn as a “hyperspace” and only the present moment is included as a 2-D plane. The point is, drawing the space-time “dimension” as a radial distance out from the center of 3-D coordinate system is simply another way of representing movement in time-space. Outward represents a projection of the future and inward represents a reflection of the past.
The way Joe McMoneagle explained how remote viewing worked was to say that he would “send information to [himself] from the future. In other words,” he said, “at some point in the future I will come to know the answer to whatever question has been put to me in the past. Therefore, whenever the information is passed to me in its accurate form, that is when I send it back to myself in the past.” (Mind Trek p. 259) He also said that this is an over-simplification, but according to the holomorphic process model, it is spot-on.
Joe also told about how he met a woman (named Karanja) in his lucid dream who knew his future and told him what to expect, which turned out to be accurate. His explanation for her was that she was a “projection of [his] self” (The Stargate Chronicles, p. 179). This makes perfect sense if he was able to see himself as both the static, localized, physical body and the dynamic, non-local space around his body. He effectively extended his body-mind outward and into what we normally consider to be the future and in-formed his future body into that of Karanja. Everything that he saw with his mind’s eyes that turned out to be true in the future, was in fact true regardless of whether he saw it from his current location or future location in space-time, and regardless of what path he took in time-space to get there. It was his future-self speaking to his current self, who might have said, had I known back then what I know now, I would have known… whatever it was he found to be true. (Joe explained this in his words on p. 180)
According to the holomorphic process model (separation, projection, reflection and reintegration), when a person thinks, he separates into a knowing-self (one’s soul or truthful-center of time-space) and a thinking-self, which projects the thought outward into space-time (future) and time-space (outside of his knowing-himself and into the great unknown). The thought forms an image onto the inside surface of a large virtual spherical movie screen, which is or represents his sphere of knowledge. What he sees is the projection as a reflection – an image that he said appeared upside-down and backwards. (The Stargate Chronicles, p. 102) That would make sense if the mind in-forms holo-lenses through which we see our thoughts. If he reflects on it, he allows his conscious mind (his conscience) to go out to the surface and identify with it, to effectively become the reflection, and look back at his own center. If the projection was in fact a reflection of truth, then he (his knowing-self) will know it and reintegrate it as a new part of the whole.
Technical discussion of a holomorphic function
In mathematics, a holomorphic function is an equation – a function of two or more variables (one of which is imaginary) that morphs into a whole (a solution) when analyzed. The word “holomorphic” is just a fancy word for “analytical” meaning it can be analyzed and produce a solution because a solution exists. The analyst just needs to find it. There are plenty of equations for which a solution does not exist so they are not holomorphic. Likewise, if information is projected that is not true, then it has no reflection in truth and cannot be reintegrated with one’s truthful center.
The fancy definition of a holomorphic function is “a complex-valued function of one or more complex variables that is complex differentiable in a neighborhood of every point in its domain.” In simple terms, it means that we can calculate a value for the instantaneous change in the variable of interest (like a change in position in space) with respect to another, independent variable, like an elapsed time (or difference in points on the time axis) and give the result a name (as a whole, like “speed of motion” in this case). In other words, the function can be successfully analyzed via differentiation (this is called taking the derivative in Calculus) within the “domain” of the space and if a solution exists, then the function was holomorphic.
To reiterate, for those who aren’t well versed in basic calculus, the function being analyzed can be differentiated mathematically, i.e. it can be written as a fraction, with the variable of interest expressed as a difference in the numerator (position2 – position1) and the reference variable that is considered to be independent, expressed as a difference in the denominator (time2 – time1), and produce a solution… with the caveat… as the difference in the independent variable (the denominator) approaches zero. The thing about a derivative is that it is a fraction that does not go to infinity when the denominator approaches zero. That is because it is not just a fraction, but a fractional change in the numerator with respect to a change in the denominator. It is all about change (like motion) and not about the fundamental aspects themselves.
Whenever we analyze something that is real, like change, but more complex than a fundamental unit, we first reduce it to units that can be held as static or constant units. For example, motion, which we normally reduce to fundamental, measurable units of space and time, is a real phenomenon that can be experienced by an object in space but can only be quantified (not actually measured) by comparing its position with respect to another point in space at multiple points during the motion (quantified and scaled as time). The reference points of the imaginary coordinate system serve as the static aspect of the whole and the moving object serves as the dynamic aspect.
In basic physics, in order to analyze an object’s speed of motion, we are taught to reduce motion to units of space (actually a change in the object’s position) as measured with respect to units of time (quantified by a change in clock position as the clock hand moves). This is a conceptual differentiation of motion, a separation of the volume of reality into “time-space” – the physical domain that contains positions in space where the object is moving – and “space-time” – an imaginary domain that was defined and quantified by using some sort of device (a clock, which also exists in “time-space”) that changes in a cyclic manner. “Time-space” is ordinary 3-D space, which can be modeled as an imaginary sphere, called the universe, and “space-time” is the “clock-time” that is used as the independent variable. Both of these are simply projected as separate coordinate systems, purely for the purpose of quantifying them.
The mistake we make, and the reason physics fails to serve as a means for understanding metaphysics, is that we are taught to believe – thus it is considered scientism – that space (i.e. “time-space”) and time (i.e. “space-time”) are fundamentally different. However, the object is not moving in space and time, since these are made-up words; it is moving in reality. Units of time-space and space-time are simply conceptual tools that we use to quantify what we perceive as this type of change in reality. Any type of change can be used as a time standard. “Space-time” simply lets us know that something that changes positions in space is what was used to make the standard.
Space-time and its inverse, time-space
Notice that the term “space-time” is the inverse of “time-space.” It can be shown, in principle and in practice, that our normal concepts of space and time units are actually inverse perceptions of the same unit of reality. To understand this, we start by defining the word Universe (with a capital “U”) to mean infinite, unbounded space. Then imagine a point-particle, perhaps the smallest particulate unit of energy that we know to exist. According to the law of conservation of energy, energy can neither be created nor destroyed, only changed in form. That means we can define the known universe (small “u”) as a whole, i.e. as a single unit that is a subset or subdomain of the infinite Universe. It has a finite amount of energy equal to 1 unit.
Now, if a particle is actually formed in the universe, it must have a finite size, which can be quantified and identified (named, labeled, symbolized, etc.) as dp, or difference in the position of one side and the other. We can therefore quantify the space that is not inside the particle as the inverse of dp, or 1/dp, which is a measure of the size of the space surrounding it. In essence, it represents the distance from the particle surface out to the edge of the known universe. The smaller the particle, the larger the size of the universe.
Keep in mind that this is just a mental exercise to allow us to analyze and produce an understanding of the universe as we perceive it, fragmented or divided by particles. Note that this can be interpreted both literally (fragmented) and mathematically (1 divided by dp). The whole can be visualized geometrically as an extremely tiny sphere inside of an astronomically large sphere. Mathematically, it is a superposition of the two, dp and 1/dp, which means a product, not a sum. The product that is produced when they are multiplied is dp x 1/dp = 1, which means they morphed into one, ergo it is a holomorphic process. However, morphing into a whole does not mean that the inner particle ceases to exist. It means that the two in-form the whole into a unit, as a quantum bit of information. They are inverse representations of the same whole that could also represent two bits (like 0 and 1 for digital analysis) or “fringes” as expressed in the holographic principle – a model that is used in Cosmology as part of String Theory.
Now we can use this to understand how “space-time” is the inverse of “time-space.” The symbol dp represented the size of the tiny particle, but would have been calculated by subtracting the value of two positions in space, i.e. (p2 – p1). If the position of the particle changes, the value of the difference would not change, but the actual positions would. So we should change the symbol for the particle to something like dp’ or even ds, where s stands for space. However, the inverse (1/dp) would still represent the distance from the particle surface out to the edge of the universe. That would not change because the particle is still the center of its own personally known holomorphic universe. However, it can also be understood to represent a unit of time, so dp’/dp becomes ds/dt or a unit of motion – pure (nonphysical) energy-in-motion, differentiated into what we call a particle.
The Holomorphic Process 